| Metric | Bluecore | Fast Simon | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 21 | 21 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 77 | 77 | Tie |
| SEO | 85 | 85 | Tie |
| Security | 71 | 71 | Tie |
| TTFB | 180ms | 180ms | Tie |
| Composite | 72 | 72 | Tie |
Bluecore and Fast Simon are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Bluecore has a composite score of 72 while Fast Simon scores 72.
Bluecore doesn't clearly lead Fast Simon in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Fast Simon doesn't clearly lead Bluecore in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Bluecore sites and 1 audited Fast Simon sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback