Based on 1 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Bold Commerce | Bold Options | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 30 | 30 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 91 | 91 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 77 | 77 | Tie |
| SEO | 100 | 100 | Tie |
| Security | 83 | 83 | Tie |
| TTFB | 102ms | 102ms | Tie |
| Composite | 83 | 83 | Tie |
Bold Commerce and Bold Options are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Bold Commerce has a composite score of 83 while Bold Options scores 83.
Bold Commerce doesn't clearly lead Bold Options in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Bold Options doesn't clearly lead Bold Commerce in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Bold Commerce sites and 1 audited Bold Options sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback