Based on 1 and 1474 real audits
| Metric | Bold Commerce | Winner | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 30 | 38 | |
| Accessibility | 91 | 89 | Bold Commerce |
| Best Practices | 77 | 85 | |
| SEO | 100 | 90 | Bold Commerce |
| Security | 83 | 67 | Bold Commerce |
| TTFB | 102ms | 281ms | Bold Commerce |
| Composite | 83 | 73 | Bold Commerce |
Bold Commerce outperforms Facebook in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (83 vs 73). Facebook leads in performance, best practices.
Choose Bold Commerce when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Facebook when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Bold Commerce sites and 1474 audited Facebook sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback