| Metric | Boomerang | React | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 32 | 38 | React |
| Accessibility | 89 | 89 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 81 | 87 | React |
| SEO | 89 | 93 | React |
| Security | 64 | 66 | React |
| TTFB | 408ms | 315ms | React |
| Composite | 71 | 73 | React |
React outperforms Boomerang in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 71). Boomerang leads in no categories.
Boomerang doesn't clearly lead React in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose React when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 154 audited Boomerang sites and 998 audited React sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback