Based on 31 and 1582 real audits
| Metric | Bootstrap Icons | core-js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 36 | Bootstrap Icons |
| Accessibility | 90 | 88 | Bootstrap Icons |
| Best Practices | 82 | 84 | core-js |
| SEO | 89 | 91 | core-js |
| Security | 67 | 65 | Bootstrap Icons |
| TTFB | 638ms | 374ms | core-js |
| Composite | 73 | 72 | Bootstrap Icons |
Bootstrap Icons outperforms core-js in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). core-js leads in best practices, SEO, TTFB.
Choose Bootstrap Icons when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 31 audited Bootstrap Icons sites and 1582 audited core-js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback