| Metric | Bootstrap | cdnjs | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 46 | 39 | Bootstrap |
| Accessibility | 87 | 88 | cdnjs |
| Best Practices | 87 | 86 | Bootstrap |
| SEO | 90 | 90 | Tie |
| Security | 64 | 65 | cdnjs |
| TTFB | 431ms | 361ms | cdnjs |
| Composite | 73 | 73 | Tie |
cdnjs outperforms Bootstrap in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Bootstrap leads in performance, best practices.
Choose Bootstrap when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose cdnjs when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 875 audited Bootstrap sites and 351 audited cdnjs sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback