| Metric | Bootstrap | core-js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 46 | 36 | Bootstrap |
| Accessibility | 87 | 88 | core-js |
| Best Practices | 88 | 84 | Bootstrap |
| SEO | 90 | 91 | core-js |
| Security | 65 | 65 | Tie |
| TTFB | 432ms | 379ms | core-js |
| Composite | 74 | 72 | Bootstrap |
Bootstrap and core-js are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Bootstrap has a composite score of 74 while core-js scores 72.
Choose Bootstrap when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 905 audited Bootstrap sites and 1600 audited core-js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback