Based on 824 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Bootstrap | Ivory Search | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 45 | 27 | Bootstrap |
| Accessibility | 87 | 100 | Ivory Search |
| Best Practices | 88 | 92 | Ivory Search |
| SEO | 90 | 92 | Ivory Search |
| Security | 64 | 79 | Ivory Search |
| TTFB | 424ms | 545ms | Bootstrap |
| Composite | 73 | 78 | Ivory Search |
Ivory Search outperforms Bootstrap in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 73). Bootstrap leads in performance, TTFB.
Choose Bootstrap when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Ivory Search when your primary concern is security and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 824 audited Bootstrap sites and 1 audited Ivory Search sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback