| Metric | Bootstrap | List.js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 47 | 48 | List.js |
| Accessibility | 87 | 80 | Bootstrap |
| Best Practices | 88 | 91 | List.js |
| SEO | 90 | 86 | Bootstrap |
| Security | 66 | 66 | Tie |
| TTFB | 441ms | 468ms | Bootstrap |
| Composite | 74 | 74 | Tie |
Bootstrap outperforms List.js in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 74). List.js leads in performance, best practices.
Choose Bootstrap when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose List.js when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1010 audited Bootstrap sites and 14 audited List.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback