Based on 905 and 136 real audits
| Metric | Bootstrap | Matomo Analytics | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 46 | 52 | Matomo Analytics |
| Accessibility | 87 | 88 | Matomo Analytics |
| Best Practices | 88 | 89 | Matomo Analytics |
| SEO | 90 | 90 | Tie |
| Security | 65 | 65 | Tie |
| TTFB | 432ms | 428ms | Matomo Analytics |
| Composite | 74 | 74 | Tie |
Matomo Analytics outperforms Bootstrap in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 74). Bootstrap leads in no categories.
Bootstrap doesn't clearly lead Matomo Analytics in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Matomo Analytics when your primary concern is performance and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 905 audited Bootstrap sites and 136 audited Matomo Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback