| Metric | Bootstrap | PHP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 46 | 47 | PHP |
| Accessibility | 87 | 89 | PHP |
| Best Practices | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| SEO | 90 | 91 | PHP |
| Security | 65 | 66 | PHP |
| TTFB | 432ms | 430ms | PHP |
| Composite | 74 | 74 | Tie |
PHP outperforms Bootstrap in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 74). Bootstrap leads in no categories.
Bootstrap doesn't clearly lead PHP in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose PHP when your primary concern is accessibility and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 903 audited Bootstrap sites and 1061 audited PHP sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback