Based on 1038 and 77 real audits
| Metric | Bootstrap | RequireJS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 47 | 43 | Bootstrap |
| Accessibility | 87 | 84 | Bootstrap |
| Best Practices | 88 | 85 | Bootstrap |
| SEO | 91 | 90 | Bootstrap |
| Security | 67 | 66 | Bootstrap |
| TTFB | 456ms | 385ms | RequireJS |
| Composite | 75 | 73 | Bootstrap |
Bootstrap outperforms RequireJS in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). RequireJS leads in TTFB.
Choose Bootstrap when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose RequireJS when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1038 audited Bootstrap sites and 77 audited RequireJS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback