Based on 903 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Bootstrap | Wicked Reports | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 46 | 25 | Bootstrap |
| Accessibility | 87 | 80 | Bootstrap |
| Best Practices | 88 | 73 | Bootstrap |
| SEO | 90 | 77 | Bootstrap |
| Security | 65 | 75 | Wicked Reports |
| TTFB | 432ms | 106ms | Wicked Reports |
| Composite | 74 | 70 | Bootstrap |
Bootstrap outperforms Wicked Reports in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 70). Wicked Reports leads in security, TTFB.
Choose Bootstrap when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Wicked Reports when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 903 audited Bootstrap sites and 1 audited Wicked Reports sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback