| Metric | Boutiq | LimeSpot | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 26 | 26 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 90 | 90 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| SEO | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Security | 80 | 80 | Tie |
| TTFB | 396ms | 396ms | Tie |
| Composite | 79 | 79 | Tie |
Boutiq and LimeSpot are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Boutiq has a composite score of 79 while LimeSpot scores 79.
Boutiq doesn't clearly lead LimeSpot in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
LimeSpot doesn't clearly lead Boutiq in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Boutiq sites and 1 audited LimeSpot sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback