Based on 2 and 1779 real audits
| Metric | bowser | Google Workspace | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 71 | 45 | bowser |
| Accessibility | 79 | 88 | Google Workspace |
| Best Practices | 86 | 87 | Google Workspace |
| SEO | 92 | 90 | bowser |
| Security | 72 | 67 | bowser |
| TTFB | 285ms | 282ms | Google Workspace |
| Composite | 76 | 74 | bowser |
bowser outperforms Google Workspace in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 74). Google Workspace leads in accessibility, best practices, TTFB.
Choose bowser when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Google Workspace when your primary concern is accessibility and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2 audited bowser sites and 1779 audited Google Workspace sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback