| Metric | Braze | Facebook SDK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 33 | 32 | Braze |
| Accessibility | 83 | 88 | Facebook SDK |
| Best Practices | 78 | 79 | Facebook SDK |
| SEO | 93 | 91 | Braze |
| Security | 65 | 64 | Braze |
| TTFB | 420ms | 395ms | Facebook SDK |
| Composite | 71 | 72 | Facebook SDK |
Facebook SDK outperforms Braze in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 71). Braze leads in performance, SEO, security.
Choose Braze when your primary concern is SEO and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Facebook SDK when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 10 audited Braze sites and 636 audited Facebook SDK sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback