| Metric | Breeze | core-js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 63 | 37 | Breeze |
| Accessibility | 94 | 88 | Breeze |
| Best Practices | 92 | 84 | Breeze |
| SEO | 92 | 91 | Breeze |
| Security | 81 | 66 | Breeze |
| TTFB | 357ms | 421ms | Breeze |
| Composite | 83 | 73 | Breeze |
Breeze outperforms core-js in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (83 vs 73). core-js leads in no categories.
Choose Breeze when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
core-js doesn't clearly lead Breeze in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Breeze sites and 1726 audited core-js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback