Based on 1 and 1841 real audits
| Metric | Broadstreet | core-js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 49 | 37 | Broadstreet |
| Accessibility | 81 | 88 | core-js |
| Best Practices | 81 | 85 | core-js |
| SEO | 92 | 91 | Broadstreet |
| Security | 62 | 67 | core-js |
| TTFB | 227ms | 439ms | Broadstreet |
| Composite | 74 | 74 | Tie |
Broadstreet and core-js are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Broadstreet has a composite score of 74 while core-js scores 74.
Choose Broadstreet when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is accessibility and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Broadstreet sites and 1841 audited core-js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback