Based on 17 and 4286 real audits
| Metric | BugSnag | Google Search Console | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 40 | 46 | Google Search Console |
| Accessibility | 92 | 88 | BugSnag |
| Best Practices | 91 | 87 | BugSnag |
| SEO | 90 | 91 | Google Search Console |
| Security | 68 | 69 | Google Search Console |
| TTFB | 198ms | 360ms | BugSnag |
| Composite | 75 | 75 | Tie |
BugSnag and Google Search Console are closely matched, each leading in different categories. BugSnag has a composite score of 75 while Google Search Console scores 75.
Choose BugSnag when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Google Search Console when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 17 audited BugSnag sites and 4286 audited Google Search Console sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback