Based on 19 and 1816 real audits
| Metric | Bunny Fonts | core-js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 53 | 37 | Bunny Fonts |
| Accessibility | 91 | 88 | Bunny Fonts |
| Best Practices | 92 | 85 | Bunny Fonts |
| SEO | 92 | 91 | Bunny Fonts |
| Security | 74 | 67 | Bunny Fonts |
| TTFB | 647ms | 432ms | core-js |
| Composite | 79 | 73 | Bunny Fonts |
Bunny Fonts outperforms core-js in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (79 vs 73). core-js leads in TTFB.
Choose Bunny Fonts when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 19 audited Bunny Fonts sites and 1816 audited core-js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback