| Metric | Bunny Fonts | React | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 46 | 46 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 92 | 90 | Bunny Fonts |
| Best Practices | 91 | 90 | Bunny Fonts |
| SEO | 93 | 93 | Tie |
| Security | 77 | 72 | Bunny Fonts |
| TTFB | 550ms | 466ms | React |
| Composite | 80 | 77 | Bunny Fonts |
Bunny Fonts outperforms React in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (80 vs 77). React leads in TTFB.
Choose Bunny Fonts when your primary concern is security and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose React when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 32 audited Bunny Fonts sites and 1545 audited React sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback