| Metric | Bunny | Bunny Fonts | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 41 | 44 | Bunny Fonts |
| Accessibility | 87 | 84 | Bunny |
| Best Practices | 84 | 87 | Bunny Fonts |
| SEO | 93 | 93 | Tie |
| Security | 65 | 63 | Bunny |
| TTFB | 255ms | 311ms | Bunny |
| Composite | 73 | 73 | Tie |
Bunny outperforms Bunny Fonts in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Bunny Fonts leads in performance, best practices.
Choose Bunny when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Bunny Fonts when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 25 audited Bunny sites and 6 audited Bunny Fonts sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback