| Metric | Bunny | core-js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 43 | 36 | Bunny |
| Accessibility | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 85 | 84 | Bunny |
| SEO | 94 | 91 | Bunny |
| Security | 66 | 66 | Tie |
| TTFB | 302ms | 396ms | Bunny |
| Composite | 74 | 73 | Bunny |
Bunny outperforms core-js in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). core-js leads in no categories.
Choose Bunny when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
core-js doesn't clearly lead Bunny in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 27 audited Bunny sites and 1687 audited core-js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback