Skip to content

Bunny vs core-js

Based on 25 and 1600 real audits

View Bunny details | View core-js details
MetricBunnycore-jsWinner
Performance4135Bunny
Accessibility8787Tie
Best Practices8483Bunny
SEO9391Bunny
Security6565Tie
TTFB255ms378msBunny
Composite7372Bunny
Performance
Bunny
41
core-js
35
Accessibility
Bunny
87
core-js
87
Security
Bunny
65
core-js
65
SEO
Bunny
93
core-js
91
Composite
Bunny
73
core-js
72

Bunny outperforms core-js in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). core-js leads in no categories.

When to choose Bunny

Choose Bunny when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose core-js

core-js doesn't clearly lead Bunny in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 25 audited Bunny sites and 1600 audited core-js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Bunny or core-js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Bunny sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (41 vs 35 on average).
Which has better security, Bunny or core-js?
Bunny sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Bunny or core-js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Bunny (87 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Bunny or core-js?
Bunny sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Bunny or core-js?
Bunny sites show lower Time to First Byte (255 ms vs 378 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Bunny or core-js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Bunny scores higher on overall composite score while Bunny may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback