Skip to content

Bunny vs core-js

Based on 40 and 1841 real audits

View Bunny details | View core-js details
MetricBunnycore-jsWinner
Performance4737Bunny
Accessibility9088Bunny
Best Practices8885Bunny
SEO9391Bunny
Security7067Bunny
TTFB433ms439msBunny
Composite7774Bunny
Performance
Bunny
47
core-js
37
Accessibility
Bunny
90
core-js
88
Security
Bunny
70
core-js
67
SEO
Bunny
93
core-js
91
Composite
Bunny
77
core-js
74

Bunny outperforms core-js in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 74). core-js leads in no categories.

When to choose Bunny

Choose Bunny when your primary concern is performance and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose core-js

core-js doesn't clearly lead Bunny in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 40 audited Bunny sites and 1841 audited core-js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Bunny or core-js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Bunny sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (47 vs 37 on average).
Which has better security, Bunny or core-js?
Bunny sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Bunny or core-js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Bunny (90 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Bunny or core-js?
Bunny sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Bunny or core-js?
Bunny sites show lower Time to First Byte (433 ms vs 439 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Bunny or core-js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Bunny scores higher on overall composite score while Bunny may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback