| Metric | Bunny | core-js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 41 | 36 | Bunny |
| Accessibility | 87 | 88 | core-js |
| Best Practices | 84 | 84 | Tie |
| SEO | 93 | 91 | Bunny |
| Security | 65 | 65 | Tie |
| TTFB | 255ms | 371ms | Bunny |
| Composite | 73 | 72 | Bunny |
Bunny outperforms core-js in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). core-js leads in accessibility.
Choose Bunny when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 25 audited Bunny sites and 1570 audited core-js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback