Skip to content

Bunny vs HSTS

Based on 27 and 2853 real audits

View Bunny details | View HSTS details
MetricBunnyHSTSWinner
Performance4350HSTS
Accessibility8889HSTS
Best Practices8588HSTS
SEO9491Bunny
Security6671HSTS
TTFB302ms369msBunny
Composite7476HSTS
Performance
Bunny
43
HSTS
50
Accessibility
Bunny
88
HSTS
89
Security
Bunny
66
HSTS
71
SEO
Bunny
94
HSTS
91
Composite
Bunny
74
HSTS
76

HSTS outperforms Bunny in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 74). Bunny leads in SEO, TTFB.

When to choose Bunny

Choose Bunny when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 27 audited Bunny sites and 2853 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Bunny or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (50 vs 43 on average).
Which has better security, Bunny or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (71 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Bunny or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (89 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Bunny or HSTS?
Bunny sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (94 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Bunny or HSTS?
Bunny sites show lower Time to First Byte (302 ms vs 369 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Bunny or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while Bunny may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback