Skip to content

Bunny vs Microsoft

Based on 25 and 2412 real audits

View Bunny details | View Microsoft details
MetricBunnyMicrosoftWinner
Performance4139Bunny
Accessibility8789Microsoft
Best Practices8486Microsoft
SEO9389Bunny
Security6566Microsoft
TTFB255ms329msBunny
Composite7372Bunny
Performance
Bunny
41
Microsoft
39
Accessibility
Bunny
87
Microsoft
89
Security
Bunny
65
Microsoft
66
SEO
Bunny
93
Microsoft
89
Composite
Bunny
73
Microsoft
72

Bunny outperforms Microsoft in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Microsoft leads in accessibility, best practices, security.

When to choose Bunny

Choose Bunny when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Microsoft

Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is accessibility and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 25 audited Bunny sites and 2412 audited Microsoft sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Bunny or Microsoft?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Bunny sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (41 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, Bunny or Microsoft?
Microsoft sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Bunny or Microsoft?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Microsoft (89 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Bunny or Microsoft?
Bunny sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Bunny or Microsoft?
Bunny sites show lower Time to First Byte (255 ms vs 329 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Bunny or Microsoft for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Bunny scores higher on overall composite score while Bunny may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback