Skip to content

Bunny vs Microsoft

Based on 27 and 2504 real audits

View Bunny details | View Microsoft details
MetricBunnyMicrosoftWinner
Performance4340Bunny
Accessibility8889Microsoft
Best Practices8586Microsoft
SEO9489Bunny
Security6667Microsoft
TTFB302ms330msBunny
Composite7473Bunny
Performance
Bunny
43
Microsoft
40
Accessibility
Bunny
88
Microsoft
89
Security
Bunny
66
Microsoft
67
SEO
Bunny
94
Microsoft
89
Composite
Bunny
74
Microsoft
73

Bunny outperforms Microsoft in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Microsoft leads in accessibility, best practices, security.

When to choose Bunny

Choose Bunny when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Microsoft

Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is accessibility and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 27 audited Bunny sites and 2504 audited Microsoft sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Bunny or Microsoft?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Bunny sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (43 vs 40 on average).
Which has better security, Bunny or Microsoft?
Microsoft sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Bunny or Microsoft?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Microsoft (89 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Bunny or Microsoft?
Bunny sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (94 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Bunny or Microsoft?
Bunny sites show lower Time to First Byte (302 ms vs 330 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Bunny or Microsoft for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Bunny scores higher on overall composite score while Bunny may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback