Skip to content

Bunny vs PHP

Based on 40 and 1376 real audits

View Bunny details | View PHP details
MetricBunnyPHPWinner
Performance4748PHP
Accessibility9088Bunny
Best Practices8889PHP
SEO9391Bunny
Security7069Bunny
TTFB433ms554msBunny
Composite7776Bunny
Performance
Bunny
47
PHP
48
Accessibility
Bunny
90
PHP
88
Security
Bunny
70
PHP
69
SEO
Bunny
93
PHP
91
Composite
Bunny
77
PHP
76

Bunny outperforms PHP in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 76). PHP leads in performance, best practices.

When to choose Bunny

Choose Bunny when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose PHP

Choose PHP when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 40 audited Bunny sites and 1376 audited PHP sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Bunny or PHP?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, PHP sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (48 vs 47 on average).
Which has better security, Bunny or PHP?
Bunny sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 69 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Bunny or PHP?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Bunny (90 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Bunny or PHP?
Bunny sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Bunny or PHP?
Bunny sites show lower Time to First Byte (433 ms vs 554 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Bunny or PHP for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. PHP scores higher on overall composite score while Bunny may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback