Skip to content

ButterCMS vs DigitalOcean Spaces

Based on 1 and 2 real audits

View ButterCMS details | View DigitalOcean Spaces details
MetricButterCMSDigitalOcean SpacesWinner
Performance3040DigitalOcean Spaces
Accessibility8688DigitalOcean Spaces
Best Practices8894DigitalOcean Spaces
SEO9296DigitalOcean Spaces
Security5967DigitalOcean Spaces
TTFB367ms228msDigitalOcean Spaces
Composite7174DigitalOcean Spaces
Performance
ButterCMS
30
DigitalOcean Spaces
40
Accessibility
ButterCMS
86
DigitalOcean Spaces
88
Security
ButterCMS
59
DigitalOcean Spaces
67
SEO
ButterCMS
92
DigitalOcean Spaces
96
Composite
ButterCMS
71
DigitalOcean Spaces
74

DigitalOcean Spaces outperforms ButterCMS in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 71). ButterCMS leads in no categories.

When to choose ButterCMS

ButterCMS doesn't clearly lead DigitalOcean Spaces in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

When to choose DigitalOcean Spaces

Choose DigitalOcean Spaces when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1 audited ButterCMS sites and 2 audited DigitalOcean Spaces sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, ButterCMS or DigitalOcean Spaces?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, DigitalOcean Spaces sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (40 vs 30 on average).
Which has better security, ButterCMS or DigitalOcean Spaces?
DigitalOcean Spaces sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 59 on average).
Which has better accessibility, ButterCMS or DigitalOcean Spaces?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor DigitalOcean Spaces (88 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, ButterCMS or DigitalOcean Spaces?
DigitalOcean Spaces sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (96 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), ButterCMS or DigitalOcean Spaces?
DigitalOcean Spaces sites show lower Time to First Byte (228 ms vs 367 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose ButterCMS or DigitalOcean Spaces for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. DigitalOcean Spaces scores higher on overall composite score while ButterCMS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback