Skip to content

BySide vs Dynatrace RUM

Based on 1 and 15 real audits

View BySide details | View Dynatrace RUM details
MetricBySideDynatrace RUMWinner
Performance3136Dynatrace RUM
Accessibility9994BySide
Best Practices7784Dynatrace RUM
SEO10094BySide
Security6268Dynatrace RUM
TTFB128ms429msBySide
Composite7074Dynatrace RUM
Performance
BySide
31
Dynatrace RUM
36
Accessibility
BySide
99
Dynatrace RUM
94
Security
BySide
62
Dynatrace RUM
68
SEO
BySide
100
Dynatrace RUM
94
Composite
BySide
70
Dynatrace RUM
74

Dynatrace RUM outperforms BySide in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 70). BySide leads in accessibility, SEO, TTFB.

When to choose BySide

Choose BySide when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Dynatrace RUM

Choose Dynatrace RUM when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1 audited BySide sites and 15 audited Dynatrace RUM sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, BySide or Dynatrace RUM?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Dynatrace RUM sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (36 vs 31 on average).
Which has better security, BySide or Dynatrace RUM?
Dynatrace RUM sites score higher on security analysis (68 vs 62 on average).
Which has better accessibility, BySide or Dynatrace RUM?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor BySide (99 vs 94). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, BySide or Dynatrace RUM?
BySide sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 94 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), BySide or Dynatrace RUM?
BySide sites show lower Time to First Byte (128 ms vs 429 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose BySide or Dynatrace RUM for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Dynatrace RUM scores higher on overall composite score while BySide may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback