Based on 1 and 32 real audits
| Metric | Cabin | Consent Manager | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 32 | 43 | Consent Manager |
| Accessibility | 97 | 88 | Cabin |
| Best Practices | 96 | 83 | Cabin |
| SEO | 100 | 92 | Cabin |
| Security | 76 | 66 | Cabin |
| TTFB | 51ms | 316ms | Cabin |
| Composite | 77 | 74 | Cabin |
Cabin outperforms Consent Manager in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 74). Consent Manager leads in performance.
Choose Cabin when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Consent Manager when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Cabin sites and 32 audited Consent Manager sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback