Skip to content

CallTrackingMetrics vs HSTS

Based on 2 and 3294 real audits

View CallTrackingMetrics details | View HSTS details
MetricCallTrackingMetricsHSTSWinner
Performance3652HSTS
Accessibility9190CallTrackingMetrics
Best Practices8489HSTS
SEO9292Tie
Security8273CallTrackingMetrics
TTFB335ms403msCallTrackingMetrics
Composite7978CallTrackingMetrics
Performance
CallTrackingMetrics
36
HSTS
52
Accessibility
CallTrackingMetrics
91
HSTS
90
Security
CallTrackingMetrics
82
HSTS
73
SEO
CallTrackingMetrics
92
HSTS
92
Composite
CallTrackingMetrics
79
HSTS
78

CallTrackingMetrics outperforms HSTS in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (79 vs 78). HSTS leads in performance, best practices.

When to choose CallTrackingMetrics

Choose CallTrackingMetrics when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2 audited CallTrackingMetrics sites and 3294 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, CallTrackingMetrics or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (52 vs 36 on average).
Which has better security, CallTrackingMetrics or HSTS?
CallTrackingMetrics sites score higher on security analysis (82 vs 73 on average).
Which has better accessibility, CallTrackingMetrics or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor CallTrackingMetrics (91 vs 90). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, CallTrackingMetrics or HSTS?
CallTrackingMetrics sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), CallTrackingMetrics or HSTS?
CallTrackingMetrics sites show lower Time to First Byte (335 ms vs 403 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose CallTrackingMetrics or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while CallTrackingMetrics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback