| Metric | Canyon | Cloudflare | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 35 | 49 | Cloudflare |
| Accessibility | 97 | 88 | Canyon |
| Best Practices | 84 | 86 | Cloudflare |
| SEO | 92 | 89 | Canyon |
| Security | 66 | 68 | Cloudflare |
| TTFB | 62ms | 298ms | Canyon |
| Composite | 74 | 75 | Cloudflare |
Cloudflare outperforms Canyon in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). Canyon leads in accessibility, SEO, TTFB.
Choose Canyon when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Cloudflare when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2 audited Canyon sites and 2145 audited Cloudflare sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback