Based on 6 and 4938 real audits
| Metric | Carbon Ads | Open Graph | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 70 | 50 | Carbon Ads |
| Accessibility | 91 | 89 | Carbon Ads |
| Best Practices | 80 | 90 | Open Graph |
| SEO | 95 | 93 | Carbon Ads |
| Security | 60 | 71 | Open Graph |
| TTFB | 174ms | 441ms | Carbon Ads |
| Composite | 76 | 77 | Open Graph |
Carbon Ads outperforms Open Graph in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 77). Open Graph leads in best practices, security, composite score.
Choose Carbon Ads when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is security and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 6 audited Carbon Ads sites and 4938 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback