Skip to content

Cargo vs Facebook

Based on 1 and 1367 real audits

View Cargo details | View Facebook details
MetricCargoFacebookWinner
Performance4838Cargo
Accessibility6889Facebook
Best Practices10084Cargo
SEO9290Cargo
Security5866Facebook
TTFB428ms275msFacebook
Composite6972Facebook
Performance
Cargo
48
Facebook
38
Accessibility
Cargo
68
Facebook
89
Security
Cargo
58
Facebook
66
SEO
Cargo
92
Facebook
90
Composite
Cargo
69
Facebook
72

Facebook outperforms Cargo in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 69). Cargo leads in performance, best practices, SEO.

When to choose Cargo

Choose Cargo when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Facebook

Choose Facebook when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1 audited Cargo sites and 1367 audited Facebook sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Cargo or Facebook?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Cargo sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (48 vs 38 on average).
Which has better security, Cargo or Facebook?
Facebook sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 58 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Cargo or Facebook?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Facebook (89 vs 68). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Cargo or Facebook?
Cargo sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Cargo or Facebook?
Facebook sites show lower Time to First Byte (275 ms vs 428 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Cargo or Facebook for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Cargo scores higher on overall composite score while Cargo may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback