Based on 537 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Cart Functionality | Conversion Bear | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 99 | Conversion Bear |
| Accessibility | 87 | 65 | Cart Functionality |
| Best Practices | 85 | 100 | Conversion Bear |
| SEO | 90 | 83 | Cart Functionality |
| Security | 66 | 76 | Conversion Bear |
| TTFB | 369ms | 1494ms | Cart Functionality |
| Composite | 73 | 77 | Conversion Bear |
Conversion Bear outperforms Cart Functionality in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 73). Cart Functionality leads in accessibility, SEO, TTFB.
Choose Cart Functionality when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Conversion Bear when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 537 audited Cart Functionality sites and 1 audited Conversion Bear sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback