Based on 550 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Cart Functionality | OceanWP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 66 | OceanWP |
| Accessibility | 87 | 87 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 85 | 92 | OceanWP |
| SEO | 90 | 92 | OceanWP |
| Security | 66 | 77 | OceanWP |
| TTFB | 373ms | 156ms | OceanWP |
| Composite | 73 | 79 | OceanWP |
OceanWP outperforms Cart Functionality in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (79 vs 73). Cart Functionality leads in no categories.
Cart Functionality doesn't clearly lead OceanWP in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose OceanWP when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 550 audited Cart Functionality sites and 1 audited OceanWP sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback