Skip to content

cdnjs vs CREMA

Based on 358 and 1 real audits

View cdnjs details | View CREMA details
MetriccdnjsCREMAWinner
Performance3927cdnjs
Accessibility8877cdnjs
Best Practices8673cdnjs
SEO9083cdnjs
Security6576CREMA
TTFB366ms1058mscdnjs
Composite7373Tie
Performance
cdnjs
39
CREMA
27
Accessibility
cdnjs
88
CREMA
77
Security
cdnjs
65
CREMA
76
SEO
cdnjs
90
CREMA
83
Composite
cdnjs
73
CREMA
73

cdnjs outperforms CREMA in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). CREMA leads in security.

When to choose cdnjs

Choose cdnjs when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose CREMA

Choose CREMA when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 358 audited cdnjs sites and 1 audited CREMA sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, cdnjs or CREMA?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, cdnjs sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (39 vs 27 on average).
Which has better security, cdnjs or CREMA?
CREMA sites score higher on security analysis (76 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, cdnjs or CREMA?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor cdnjs (88 vs 77). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, cdnjs or CREMA?
cdnjs sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 83 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), cdnjs or CREMA?
cdnjs sites show lower Time to First Byte (366 ms vs 1058 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose cdnjs or CREMA for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. cdnjs scores higher on overall composite score while cdnjs may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback