Skip to content

cdnjs vs Foursixty

Based on 373 and 1 real audits

View cdnjs details | View Foursixty details
MetriccdnjsFoursixtyWinner
Performance4016cdnjs
Accessibility8893Foursixty
Best Practices8677cdnjs
SEO90100Foursixty
Security6570Foursixty
TTFB367ms156msFoursixty
Composite7374Foursixty
Performance
cdnjs
40
Foursixty
16
Accessibility
cdnjs
88
Foursixty
93
Security
cdnjs
65
Foursixty
70
SEO
cdnjs
90
Foursixty
100
Composite
cdnjs
73
Foursixty
74

Foursixty outperforms cdnjs in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). cdnjs leads in performance, best practices.

When to choose cdnjs

Choose cdnjs when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Foursixty

Choose Foursixty when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 373 audited cdnjs sites and 1 audited Foursixty sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, cdnjs or Foursixty?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, cdnjs sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (40 vs 16 on average).
Which has better security, cdnjs or Foursixty?
Foursixty sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, cdnjs or Foursixty?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Foursixty (93 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, cdnjs or Foursixty?
Foursixty sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), cdnjs or Foursixty?
Foursixty sites show lower Time to First Byte (156 ms vs 367 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose cdnjs or Foursixty for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. cdnjs scores higher on overall composite score while cdnjs may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback