Skip to content

cdnjs vs Google Analytics

Based on 373 and 1936 real audits

View cdnjs details | View Google Analytics details
MetriccdnjsGoogle AnalyticsWinner
Performance4041Google Analytics
Accessibility8887cdnjs
Best Practices8685cdnjs
SEO9091Google Analytics
Security6565Tie
TTFB367ms406mscdnjs
Composite7373Tie
Performance
cdnjs
40
Google Analytics
41
Accessibility
cdnjs
88
Google Analytics
87
Security
cdnjs
65
Google Analytics
65
SEO
cdnjs
90
Google Analytics
91
Composite
cdnjs
73
Google Analytics
73

cdnjs outperforms Google Analytics in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Google Analytics leads in performance, SEO.

When to choose cdnjs

Choose cdnjs when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Google Analytics

Choose Google Analytics when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 373 audited cdnjs sites and 1936 audited Google Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, cdnjs or Google Analytics?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (41 vs 40 on average).
Which has better security, cdnjs or Google Analytics?
cdnjs sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, cdnjs or Google Analytics?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor cdnjs (88 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, cdnjs or Google Analytics?
Google Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), cdnjs or Google Analytics?
cdnjs sites show lower Time to First Byte (367 ms vs 406 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose cdnjs or Google Analytics for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while cdnjs may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback