Skip to content

cdnjs vs Microsoft

Based on 351 and 2412 real audits

View cdnjs details | View Microsoft details
MetriccdnjsMicrosoftWinner
Performance3939Tie
Accessibility8889Microsoft
Best Practices8686Tie
SEO9089cdnjs
Security6566Microsoft
TTFB361ms329msMicrosoft
Composite7372cdnjs
Performance
cdnjs
39
Microsoft
39
Accessibility
cdnjs
88
Microsoft
89
Security
cdnjs
65
Microsoft
66
SEO
cdnjs
90
Microsoft
89
Composite
cdnjs
73
Microsoft
72

Microsoft outperforms cdnjs in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 73). cdnjs leads in SEO, composite score.

When to choose cdnjs

Choose cdnjs when your primary concern is SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Microsoft

Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 351 audited cdnjs sites and 2412 audited Microsoft sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, cdnjs or Microsoft?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, cdnjs sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (39 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, cdnjs or Microsoft?
Microsoft sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, cdnjs or Microsoft?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Microsoft (89 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, cdnjs or Microsoft?
cdnjs sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), cdnjs or Microsoft?
Microsoft sites show lower Time to First Byte (329 ms vs 361 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose cdnjs or Microsoft for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. cdnjs scores higher on overall composite score while cdnjs may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback