Skip to content

cdnjs vs Moast

Based on 343 and 1 real audits

View cdnjs details | View Moast details
MetriccdnjsMoastWinner
Performance3957Moast
Accessibility8889Moast
Best Practices8696Moast
SEO9092Moast
Security6471Moast
TTFB360ms735mscdnjs
Composite7276Moast
Performance
cdnjs
39
Moast
57
Accessibility
cdnjs
88
Moast
89
Security
cdnjs
64
Moast
71
SEO
cdnjs
90
Moast
92
Composite
cdnjs
72
Moast
76

Moast outperforms cdnjs in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 72). cdnjs leads in TTFB.

When to choose cdnjs

Choose cdnjs when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Moast

Choose Moast when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 343 audited cdnjs sites and 1 audited Moast sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, cdnjs or Moast?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Moast sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (57 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, cdnjs or Moast?
Moast sites score higher on security analysis (71 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, cdnjs or Moast?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Moast (89 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, cdnjs or Moast?
Moast sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), cdnjs or Moast?
cdnjs sites show lower Time to First Byte (360 ms vs 735 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose cdnjs or Moast for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Moast scores higher on overall composite score while cdnjs may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback