Skip to content

cdnjs vs timeago

Based on 358 and 3 real audits

View cdnjs details | View timeago details
MetriccdnjstimeagoWinner
Performance3940timeago
Accessibility8886cdnjs
Best Practices8683cdnjs
SEO9092timeago
Security6563cdnjs
TTFB366ms189mstimeago
Composite7372cdnjs
Performance
cdnjs
39
timeago
40
Accessibility
cdnjs
88
timeago
86
Security
cdnjs
65
timeago
63
SEO
cdnjs
90
timeago
92
Composite
cdnjs
73
timeago
72

cdnjs outperforms timeago in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). timeago leads in performance, SEO, TTFB.

When to choose cdnjs

Choose cdnjs when your primary concern is best practices and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose timeago

Choose timeago when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 358 audited cdnjs sites and 3 audited timeago sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, cdnjs or timeago?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, timeago sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (40 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, cdnjs or timeago?
cdnjs sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 63 on average).
Which has better accessibility, cdnjs or timeago?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor cdnjs (88 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, cdnjs or timeago?
timeago sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), cdnjs or timeago?
timeago sites show lower Time to First Byte (189 ms vs 366 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose cdnjs or timeago for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. timeago scores higher on overall composite score while cdnjs may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback