Skip to content

cdnjs vs Wicked Reports

Based on 373 and 1 real audits

View cdnjs details | View Wicked Reports details
MetriccdnjsWicked ReportsWinner
Performance4025cdnjs
Accessibility8880cdnjs
Best Practices8673cdnjs
SEO9077cdnjs
Security6575Wicked Reports
TTFB367ms106msWicked Reports
Composite7370cdnjs
Performance
cdnjs
40
Wicked Reports
25
Accessibility
cdnjs
88
Wicked Reports
80
Security
cdnjs
65
Wicked Reports
75
SEO
cdnjs
90
Wicked Reports
77
Composite
cdnjs
73
Wicked Reports
70

cdnjs outperforms Wicked Reports in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 70). Wicked Reports leads in security, TTFB.

When to choose cdnjs

Choose cdnjs when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Wicked Reports

Choose Wicked Reports when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 373 audited cdnjs sites and 1 audited Wicked Reports sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, cdnjs or Wicked Reports?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, cdnjs sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (40 vs 25 on average).
Which has better security, cdnjs or Wicked Reports?
Wicked Reports sites score higher on security analysis (75 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, cdnjs or Wicked Reports?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor cdnjs (88 vs 80). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, cdnjs or Wicked Reports?
cdnjs sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 77 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), cdnjs or Wicked Reports?
Wicked Reports sites show lower Time to First Byte (106 ms vs 367 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose cdnjs or Wicked Reports for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. cdnjs scores higher on overall composite score while cdnjs may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback