Skip to content

CentOS vs core-js

Based on 13 and 2041 real audits

View CentOS details | View core-js details
MetricCentOScore-jsWinner
Performance4437CentOS
Accessibility9088CentOS
Best Practices8586core-js
SEO9291CentOS
Security6268core-js
TTFB1491ms483mscore-js
Composite7274core-js
Performance
CentOS
44
core-js
37
Accessibility
CentOS
90
core-js
88
Security
CentOS
62
core-js
68
SEO
CentOS
92
core-js
91
Composite
CentOS
72
core-js
74

core-js outperforms CentOS in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). CentOS leads in performance, accessibility, SEO.

When to choose CentOS

Choose CentOS when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose core-js

Choose core-js when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 13 audited CentOS sites and 2041 audited core-js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, CentOS or core-js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, CentOS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (44 vs 37 on average).
Which has better security, CentOS or core-js?
core-js sites score higher on security analysis (68 vs 62 on average).
Which has better accessibility, CentOS or core-js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor CentOS (90 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, CentOS or core-js?
CentOS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), CentOS or core-js?
core-js sites show lower Time to First Byte (483 ms vs 1491 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose CentOS or core-js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. CentOS scores higher on overall composite score while CentOS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback