Skip to content

CentOS vs OpenSSL

Based on 13 and 49 real audits

View CentOS details | View OpenSSL details
MetricCentOSOpenSSLWinner
Performance4443CentOS
Accessibility9086CentOS
Best Practices8584CentOS
SEO9289CentOS
Security6265OpenSSL
TTFB1491ms531msOpenSSL
Composite7273OpenSSL
Performance
CentOS
44
OpenSSL
43
Accessibility
CentOS
90
OpenSSL
86
Security
CentOS
62
OpenSSL
65
SEO
CentOS
92
OpenSSL
89
Composite
CentOS
72
OpenSSL
73

CentOS outperforms OpenSSL in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 73). OpenSSL leads in security, TTFB, composite score.

When to choose CentOS

Choose CentOS when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose OpenSSL

Choose OpenSSL when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 13 audited CentOS sites and 49 audited OpenSSL sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, CentOS or OpenSSL?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, CentOS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (44 vs 43 on average).
Which has better security, CentOS or OpenSSL?
OpenSSL sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 62 on average).
Which has better accessibility, CentOS or OpenSSL?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor CentOS (90 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, CentOS or OpenSSL?
CentOS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), CentOS or OpenSSL?
OpenSSL sites show lower Time to First Byte (531 ms vs 1491 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose CentOS or OpenSSL for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. CentOS scores higher on overall composite score while CentOS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback