Skip to content

CentOS vs PHP

Based on 12 and 1128 real audits

View CentOS details | View PHP details
MetricCentOSPHPWinner
Performance4848Tie
Accessibility8989Tie
Best Practices8688PHP
SEO9291CentOS
Security6067PHP
TTFB1543ms445msPHP
Composite7175PHP
Performance
CentOS
48
PHP
48
Accessibility
CentOS
89
PHP
89
Security
CentOS
60
PHP
67
SEO
CentOS
92
PHP
91
Composite
CentOS
71
PHP
75

PHP outperforms CentOS in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 71). CentOS leads in SEO.

When to choose CentOS

Choose CentOS when your primary concern is SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose PHP

Choose PHP when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 12 audited CentOS sites and 1128 audited PHP sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, CentOS or PHP?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, CentOS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (48 vs 48 on average).
Which has better security, CentOS or PHP?
PHP sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 60 on average).
Which has better accessibility, CentOS or PHP?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor CentOS (89 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, CentOS or PHP?
CentOS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), CentOS or PHP?
PHP sites show lower Time to First Byte (445 ms vs 1543 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose CentOS or PHP for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. CentOS scores higher on overall composite score while CentOS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback