Skip to content

Chartbeat vs DoubleClick Floodlight

Based on 157 and 594 real audits

View Chartbeat details | View DoubleClick Floodlight details
MetricChartbeatDoubleClick FloodlightWinner
Performance3232Tie
Accessibility8587DoubleClick Floodlight
Best Practices8381Chartbeat
SEO9191Tie
Security6364DoubleClick Floodlight
TTFB230ms340msChartbeat
Composite7272Tie
Performance
Chartbeat
32
DoubleClick Floodlight
32
Accessibility
Chartbeat
85
DoubleClick Floodlight
87
Security
Chartbeat
63
DoubleClick Floodlight
64
SEO
Chartbeat
91
DoubleClick Floodlight
91
Composite
Chartbeat
72
DoubleClick Floodlight
72

Chartbeat and DoubleClick Floodlight are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Chartbeat has a composite score of 72 while DoubleClick Floodlight scores 72.

When to choose Chartbeat

Choose Chartbeat when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose DoubleClick Floodlight

Choose DoubleClick Floodlight when your primary concern is accessibility and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 157 audited Chartbeat sites and 594 audited DoubleClick Floodlight sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Chartbeat or DoubleClick Floodlight?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Chartbeat sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (32 vs 32 on average).
Which has better security, Chartbeat or DoubleClick Floodlight?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 63 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Chartbeat or DoubleClick Floodlight?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor DoubleClick Floodlight (87 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Chartbeat or DoubleClick Floodlight?
Chartbeat sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Chartbeat or DoubleClick Floodlight?
Chartbeat sites show lower Time to First Byte (230 ms vs 340 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Chartbeat or DoubleClick Floodlight for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Chartbeat scores higher on overall composite score while Chartbeat may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback