Skip to content

Chartbeat vs DoubleClick Floodlight

Based on 160 and 676 real audits

View Chartbeat details | View DoubleClick Floodlight details
MetricChartbeatDoubleClick FloodlightWinner
Performance3233DoubleClick Floodlight
Accessibility8587DoubleClick Floodlight
Best Practices8383Tie
SEO9192DoubleClick Floodlight
Security6466DoubleClick Floodlight
TTFB227ms383msChartbeat
Composite7273DoubleClick Floodlight
Performance
Chartbeat
32
DoubleClick Floodlight
33
Accessibility
Chartbeat
85
DoubleClick Floodlight
87
Security
Chartbeat
64
DoubleClick Floodlight
66
SEO
Chartbeat
91
DoubleClick Floodlight
92
Composite
Chartbeat
72
DoubleClick Floodlight
73

DoubleClick Floodlight outperforms Chartbeat in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Chartbeat leads in TTFB.

When to choose Chartbeat

Choose Chartbeat when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose DoubleClick Floodlight

Choose DoubleClick Floodlight when your primary concern is accessibility and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 160 audited Chartbeat sites and 676 audited DoubleClick Floodlight sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Chartbeat or DoubleClick Floodlight?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (33 vs 32 on average).
Which has better security, Chartbeat or DoubleClick Floodlight?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Chartbeat or DoubleClick Floodlight?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor DoubleClick Floodlight (87 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Chartbeat or DoubleClick Floodlight?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Chartbeat or DoubleClick Floodlight?
Chartbeat sites show lower Time to First Byte (227 ms vs 383 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Chartbeat or DoubleClick Floodlight for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. DoubleClick Floodlight scores higher on overall composite score while Chartbeat may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback