| Metric | Chatsimple | core-js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 31 | 36 | core-js |
| Accessibility | 96 | 88 | Chatsimple |
| Best Practices | 73 | 84 | core-js |
| SEO | 92 | 91 | Chatsimple |
| Security | 67 | 65 | Chatsimple |
| TTFB | 637ms | 379ms | core-js |
| Composite | 72 | 72 | Tie |
Chatsimple and core-js are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Chatsimple has a composite score of 72 while core-js scores 72.
Choose Chatsimple when your primary concern is accessibility and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Chatsimple sites and 1599 audited core-js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback