Based on 5 and 3817 real audits
| Metric | Chatwoot | Google Search Console | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 51 | 44 | Chatwoot |
| Accessibility | 82 | 88 | Google Search Console |
| Best Practices | 76 | 86 | Google Search Console |
| SEO | 90 | 90 | Tie |
| Security | 75 | 67 | Chatwoot |
| TTFB | 921ms | 346ms | Google Search Console |
| Composite | 77 | 73 | Chatwoot |
Chatwoot and Google Search Console are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Chatwoot has a composite score of 77 while Google Search Console scores 73.
Choose Chatwoot when your primary concern is security and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Google Search Console when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 5 audited Chatwoot sites and 3817 audited Google Search Console sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback