| Metric | Chatwoot | Lucide | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 51 | 47 | Chatwoot |
| Accessibility | 82 | 89 | Lucide |
| Best Practices | 76 | 88 | Lucide |
| SEO | 90 | 94 | Lucide |
| Security | 75 | 70 | Chatwoot |
| TTFB | 921ms | 311ms | Lucide |
| Composite | 77 | 76 | Chatwoot |
Lucide outperforms Chatwoot in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 77). Chatwoot leads in performance, security, composite score.
Choose Chatwoot when your primary concern is security and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Lucide when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 5 audited Chatwoot sites and 71 audited Lucide sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback