Based on 5 and 3415 real audits
| Metric | Chatwoot | Open Graph | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 51 | 45 | Chatwoot |
| Accessibility | 82 | 89 | Open Graph |
| Best Practices | 76 | 87 | Open Graph |
| SEO | 90 | 92 | Open Graph |
| Security | 75 | 66 | Chatwoot |
| TTFB | 921ms | 365ms | Open Graph |
| Composite | 77 | 74 | Chatwoot |
Open Graph outperforms Chatwoot in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 77). Chatwoot leads in performance, security, composite score.
Choose Chatwoot when your primary concern is security and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 5 audited Chatwoot sites and 3415 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback